These provisions utilize to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even though the transaction occurred previous to its promulgation. Read more
A lower court may well not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it is actually unjust; it could only express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question. Should the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the law evolve, it may both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts in the cases; some jurisdictions allow for just a judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.
14. While in the light from the position explained higher than, it is concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right to generally be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be deemed for no fault of his individual and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the size of service or during the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to really make it appropriate towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision with the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Most of the volumes (together with more recent volumes than the library's holdings) will also be available online through the Caselaw Access Project.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, although it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it truly is actually quite vague about whether the 90-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based on the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held towards the 90-day notice need, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
However it is made clear that police is free to take action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject matter to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused towards the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also ensure regard with the family shed in accordance with regulation and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they're able to act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security in the house is concerned, which will not be public place under the Act 1977. nine. Looking at the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be attained. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated higher than. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf with the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf from the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian ad get more info litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for a dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their jobs with DCFS.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Referring to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice isn't served, the grievance petition might be dismissed. This is because service from the grievance notice is a mandatory requirement as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation calls for that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. Should the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times with the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided by the decision from the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
10. Based to the findings from the inquiry committee, this petition isn't thought of maintainable and is also therefore liable to become dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the uncovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this element for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance to the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.